ResortQuest Real Estate(R) Names March 2016's Top Coastal Delaware Sales Agents

BETHANY BEACH, DE—(Marketwired – April 30, 2016) – ResortQuest Real Estate® recently announced the March 2016 top producers for its southeast Sussex County, Del., offices.

Colleen Windrow of The Windrow Group at the Marketplace at Sea Colony office earned top listing and top selling honors for March.

Top listing agents by office were: Anne Powell of The Anne Powell Group at the Bethany Beach office, Marc Grimes of the Bear Trap Dunes/Ocean View office, Jen Hughes of the West Fenwick office and Ann Baker of the Edgewater/Sea Colony Oceanfront office.

Top selling agents by office were: Jennifer Smith of the Edgewater/Sea Colony Oceanfront office, Valerie Harmke of The Beach Home Group at the Bear Trap Dunes/Ocean View office, Shannon Smith of The Beach Home Group at the West Fenwick office and Dayna Feher of the Dayna Feher Team at the Bethany Beach office.

ResortQuest Real Estate is a real estate leader in southeast Sussex County since the early 1970s. ResortQuest provides comprehensive real estate services, including residential and commercial sales, vacation and long–term rentals and homeowner association management.

For the latest on real estate in the resort and inland areas of Sussex County, visit their locations at 33012 Coastal Highway or call 302–539–8600; Marketplace at Sea Colony at 33546 Marketplace or call 302–541–8999; Edgewater Lobby at L1– Edgewater House Road or call 302–537–8880; West Fenwick at 37458 Lion Drive, Suite 7 or call 302–436–1100; or Bear Trap Dunes at 21 Village Green Drive or call 302–541–5454.

The firm can also be found on the Web at ResortQuestDE.com, on Facebook, or on Twitter. For information on starting a career in real estate, contact Associate Broker Ann Baker at 302–541–5970.

About ResortQuest Real Estate®, Delaware & Maryland
ResortQuest Delaware Real Estate, LLC, a subsidiary of Wyndham Vacation Rentals North America, LLC, has provided real estate sales, vacation rental, and homeowner association management services to Bethany Beach, Sea Colony and other fine communities in Delaware's Quiet Resorts, Maryland and the surrounding coastal areas since the early 1970s. Its affiliate ResortQuest Delaware, LLC's homeowner association management division, represents the needs of more than 6,300 homeowners in 50 associations from Lewes to Fenwick Island, Del. Wyndham Vacation Rentals®, part of Wyndham Exchange & Rentals® and the Wyndham Worldwide family of brands, is the world's largest professional manager of vacation rentals, providing access to approximately 103,000 vacation rental properties in more than 550 unique destinations worldwide. For additional information, visit our media center on wyndhamvacationrentals.com.

Image Available: http://www.marketwire.com/library/MwGo/2016/4/30/11G095980/Images/ColleenWindrow2016–LG–e2d2a9d377979023bbfd8f2b4d20ead8.jpg

Compensation Hard to Ensure

By Shakhawat Liton
Apr 30 2016 (The Daily Star, Bangladesh)

The dead do not feel anything, but those who survive do. The horrendous experience of the insensitive test after rape. The courtroom insults during trial because a draconian law permits the accused to question the victim’s character. The families suffer no less humiliation as they wait for justice. While nations around the world have overhauled relevant laws with provisions that shield the rape victims, ours still favour the offender instead. Isn’t it time we were a little more sensitive towards the victims of a crime now regarded as a crime against society? In the wake of Tonu murder after suspected rape, The Daily Star tries to shed some light on all these aspects.
Today, we run the third and final instalment of the three-part series.

rape_4__She was gang raped by railway employees at the railway rest room in Kolkata while travelling in India on February 26, 1998.

The incident triggered outrage. Maitree, a network of 42 women’s groups and NGOs in Kolkata, moved to Kolkata High Court seeking compensation for the 27-year old Shefali Begum (name changed to protect her identity).

The Kolkata HC in 1999 gave her 1 million rupees compensation for the humiliation she had undergone. But the Railway Board, which was asked to pay the compensation, challenged the order in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court in January 2000 upheld the HC verdict and said: “Even those who are not citizens of this country and come merely as tourists will be entitled to the protection of their lives in accordance with the constitutional provisions.”

When the apex court ordered for the compensation, the criminal case against the rapists was still on in the lower court.

The judgement was very significant because such a huge amount was never given to a rape victim in India and that too awarded to a foreigner.

In numerous cases, Indian High Courts in different states and the Supreme Court have ordered the state governments concerned to pay compensations to rape victims for their failure to protect their dignity.

In India, the compensation process is independent of the trial process.

In Bangladesh the situation is different than that of countries like the UK and the USA. The government of Bangladesh does not need to pay compensation to a rape victim for its failure to protect the victim’s fundamental rights as a woman.

“As far as I know, there is no such case in which the government has compensated the rape victim,” said advocate Fahmida Akhtar, case manger of Bangladesh National Women Lawyers Association, an organisation that works for women who have been victims of sexual violence and abuse.

Asked, ZI Khan Panna, a Supreme Court lawyer, says they do not need to pray to the court seeking compensation from the state in sexual violence case as the offenders are made to pay compensation, if necessary.

“The court certainly will order the state to compensate the victims if the situation arises,” he told The Daily Star.

Advocate Fahmida Akhtar says special tribunals dealing with offences against women and children, in some cases, have ordered the accused to compensate their victims.

“But the path to the compensation is long, as the accused filed appeals with the higher courts against the tribunal’s orders. Disposal of the appeals takes a long time,” she told The Daily Star.

Eminent jurist Shahdeen Malik says many countries compensate rape victims. Bangladesh should also take responsibility for compensating the rape victims, he added.

“Jurisprudence in this regard should evolve,” he told The Daily Star referring to the practice in India.

The Supreme Court, in the State vs. Md. Moinul Haque and Others case in 2000, emphasised the need for compensating the victims for their rehabilitation.

It, however, observed that victims of rape should be compensated by giving them half of the property of the rapists should be given to the victims to rehabilitate them.

At present, the Woman and Child Oppression Prevention Act 2000 empowers tribunals set up under this law to hold trial of the sexual crimes against women and children for compensating the victims.

As per the law says, the tribunal may imposes any monetary fine on convicted persons and order the district collector to sell the confiscate the convicted person’s movable and immovable assets and sell them on auction. Then the collector will deposit the money to with the tribunal that will award the money to the victim as compensation.

But the completion of the process may take a long time if the convicted person files an files appeal.

So, there is no scope for a sex crime victim to get any compensation before the conclusion of her case.

PRACTICE IN OTHER COUNTRIES

A rape victim in UK is entitled to get compensation from the government. To provide the compensations to blameless victims of violent crimes including rape, the government has set up Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority–CICA.

People who have been physically or mentally injured can apply to the CICA for compensation ranging from £1,000 to £500,000.

A victim of sexual assault or rape has a right to claim compensation. The CICA in its official website says rape is a horrendous experience to endure and it can have a life long physical and psychological effect on the victim – although compensation will never put things right or reverse what has happened it can still come as invaluable financial help for treatment and counselling should you need it. Claiming compensation can help a rape victim gain back control and closure, it states.

In the United States, rape is generally prosecuted as a crime at the state level. U.S. The principal victim compensation programs for rape victims are found at the state level. However, the most significant victim compensation programs at the state level are funded by the federal Crime Victims Fund, which was established by the federal Victims of Crime Act of 1984.

A rape victim in Hong Kong is also entitled to get compensation from the state under the Criminal and Law Enforcement Injuries Compensation Scheme.

Under the Crime Victim Protection Act, a rape victim in Taiwan, a rape victim and victims of sexual assault crimes and family members of deceased victims get compensation.

INDIAN JUDICIARY SET EXAMPLES

In March, 2014, India’s Supreme Court has ordered the West Bengal government to pay 5 lakh rupees to a tribal woman who was gang-raped in January on orders of village elders.

The judges said the state had failed to protect the victim’s fundamental rights as a woman.

“No compensation can be adequate nor can it be of any respite for the victim but as the State has failed in protecting such serious violation of a victim’s fundamental right, the State is duty bound to provide compensation, which may help in the victim’s rehabilitation,” it stated.

In the Llatest case, in February this year, the Supreme Court directed all states and Union Territories to formulate a uniform scheme to provide compensation to the victims or dependents who have suffered loss as a result of such crime.

“Indisputable, no amount of money can restore the dignity and confidence that the accused took away from the victim. No amount of money can erase the trauma and grief the victim suffers. But this aid can be crucial in the aftermath of the crime,” said a SC bench headed by Justice MY Eqbal.

In this case, the court ordered the Chhattishgarh government to grant a compensation of Rs 8,000 per month compensation to an 18- year old blind girl who was subjected to sexual violence.

The SC also refused to stay the orders of Chhattishgarh High Court in which the convict was sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment.

The trial court awarded him the accused seven year a jail sentence of seven years for raping a 18-year-old the blind and illiterate girl on the false promise of marriage. The order was upheld by the Chhattishgarh High Court.

The apex court said the states should consider and formulate programmes for such victims in the light of the scheme framed in Goa which provides compensation of up to Rs 10 lakh.

This story was originally published by The Daily Star, Bangladesh

Media Ethics

By Asfiya Aziz
Apr 30 2016 (Dawn, Pakistan)

When young Bisma died in a traffic jam en route to Civil Hospital in Karachi last December, there was a media frenzy. To onlookers it looked like frenzy, devoid of principles – a burgeoning show of power by the media, the right to information overshadowing all other rights. Lately, media debate on similar issues often cross the same boundaries. The gap between what a decent society expects from their media, and what media is able to provide, appears to be widening under the myriad pressures of business and political interests.

Media organisations` business models often appear to determine to what extent basic journalistic skills of accuracy, objectivity and timeliness are stretched or strained.

Step-by-step codes of ethics are often seen as `stifling` and `inadequate` for the mercurial field of 24-hour news reporting. Regardless of business pressures, one must recognise that there is little distinction between the media`s and an individual`s responsibilities.

Both share the same societal responsibilities, and must also share a mutual understanding of ethics. A principle-based approach, therefore, may be a viable alternative framework for journalists to practise in the line of duty. Perhaps we might borrow from other fields to develop an ethics code for journalism.

Bioethics is a subject that devises standards of behaviour when dealing with living beings. One of many theories in this field is Principlism, articulated by T.L. Beauchamp and J.F. Childress in The Principles of Biomedical Ethics. The principles put forward in this book, and currently most practised, include: respect (for individual autonomy); justice; beneficence; and non-maleficence.

For practical purposes, these are rephrased as: be respectful; be fair; be kind (do good); and do no harm. Like medicine, journalism also requires constant (often quick) judgement calls to be made, and therefore needs to develop a set of principles to apply to daily situations.

Analysing the unfortunate case of Bisma from a bioethical standpoint leads us to some interesting observations. The core principles stated here were (in some form) already at work but there still remains a need to formalise such principles, to inculcate them into journalists` decision-making processes.

That day, the principle of `respect` for an individual was absent despite the intention to adhere to it. While the media protested the lack of respect for an average person`s life, they were themselves disrespectful by being invasive; evident in the coverage of her body, and her father`s distress on being pressed to comment seconds after his child had passed away.

Later, commentary shifted to speculations on the family`s economic conditions, some newscasters affecting pity when describing their modest dwelling. They disrespected mourners, zooming in on women struggling to hide their faces from the media glare. The right to information and freedom of the press are poor defences when in conflict with vulnerable parties` rights to respect, privacy and choice.

The principle of `justice` was present, as this story became newsworthy due to a perceived lack of justice and accountability. Whether the media was fair to all parties is, however, a moot point. The coverage drew attention to the state of reporters` skills of maintaining objectivity and taking all parties` positions into account. As surfaced later, some doctors and the administration of Civil Hospital denied there was any obstruction to the hospital that day. Their position was hardly part of the day`s coverage. As journalists demand justice for the people, they still need to remain judicious or `be fair` in their own decision-making. One can also argue that central to the media campaign was the principle of `beneficence`; the media advocating for the individual in particular and the public at large, suffering at the hands of perceived VIP cul-ture. `Non-maleficence` (or `do no harm`) is often a tricky principle to negotiate. The incident had escalated into a full-scale media frenzy forcing the provincial government to do damage control at a time when they were already receiving flak on other issues of governance. The question of media`s intent arises: were they doing this for the benefit of the victim and the public, or to do harm to the government and those VIPs involved? Objective analysis is an essential skill for a journalist if analysis points towards a party`s negligence or incompetence, the journalist bears a responsibility to expose such misdemeanours. However, this still remains a judgement call, which must be guided by the principle of non-maleficence and by examining one`s intent, to determine the limits of reporting.

Perhaps if journalists were to test and adapt bioethical principles in their own practices, and media organisations could reach consensus on the most ef fective and relevant principles in the field, journalism in Pakistan may finally adopt a code of ethics which practitioners could own and uphold.• The writer is a joumalist with a special interest in bioethics.

This story was originally published by Dawn, Pakistan

topcreditcardprocessors.com Announces Rankings of 10 Best Small Business Loan Programs for April 2016

NAPLES, FL—(Marketwired – April 30, 2016) – The ten top small business loan programs have been named by topcreditcardprocessors.com for the month of April 2016. topcreditcardprocessors.com provides businesses with ratings online to feature the top credit card processing services which produce remarkable solutions to businesses searching for a variety of solutions to common issues. Services are highlighted based on their performance in an in–depth investigation of their primary solutions.

The process for evaluating and selecting small business loan programs involves a month–long process of benchmarking the top competing services based on the use of a set of examination criteria and learning more about their solutions and their communications with their clients through referrals. Often times the topcreditcardprocessors.com independent examination team communicates directly with clients in order to inquire about the solutions and performance from the standpoint of the client. Other times clients visit topcreditcardprocessors.com in order to offer their opinions about the services which they use.

The 10 best small business loan programs for April 2016 are: 

1– RedFynn

2– eMerchantBroker.com

3– Credit Card Processing Specialists

4– On Deck

5– Reliant Services Group

6– Finical Inc.

7– LoanMe

8– Rafter J Funding Services

9– Strategic Merchant Solutions

10– FlashAdvance

ABOUT topcreditcardprocessors.com

topcreditcardprocessors.com is a well–known independent authority on merchant services. The central objective of topcreditcardprocessors.com is to decide and proclaim those individuals or services providing the top payment processing solutions all over the world. A specialized team of researchers examine thousands of applicants each month who are seeking to be ranked as a top payment processing product or service by the independent authority.

Those interested in applying for the rankings can visit:


http://www.topcreditcardprocessors.com/apply–for–ranking

CrowdReviews.com Announces the Rankings of the Best CRM Software

SANTA FE, NM—(Marketwired – April 30, 2016) – The leading provider of crowdsourced reviews, CrowdReviews.com, has released their list of the best CRM software based on customer reviews and experiences. The rankings on CrowdReviews.com are updated based on the use of a transparent algorithm in real–time. CrowdReviews.com has chosen to highlight the CRM software which are most prominently featured in the rankings at the time of the announcement. Users of CRM software solutions are invited to submit their own reviews and experiences on the software they have used.

The top ranked CRM software featured by the algorithm include:

1) Salesforce Sales Cloud

2) Oracle Peoplesoft

3) NetSuite CRM+

CRM software providers can compete in the rankings by inviting their customers to leave their own reviews and opinions on the software they are using. Visitors to CrowdReviews.com are also invited to leave reviews on the services and software they have used in the past or are actively using. In addition, employees, competitors, and other parties are invited to share their own opinions on service and software vendors alike.

The placements of software on the rankings are primarily influenced by customer reviews, but are ultimately determined based on five major factors. These factors are review strength, engagement strength, reviewer strength, profile strength, and verified status. Each of these five factors are determined based on numerous sub–factors which can be reviewed at any time in the following “How Do We Rank” page:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/how–do–we–rank

For the list of the best CRM software visit:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/rankings–of–best–crm–software

Those interested in joining CrowdReviews.com can visit the following page to register or claim their profile:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/#registration

About CrowdReviews.com

CrowdReviews.com is a crowdreviewing platform which ranks over 500 software categories and 200 service categories.

CrowdReviews.com Invites Businesses to Leave Reviews on Sales Force Automation Software

SANTA FE, NM—(Marketwired – April 30, 2016) – CrowdReviews.com, a platform for reviewing and ranking sales force automation software, has announced an invitation for businesses using sales force automation solutions to leave reviews on the software they have used. The platform uses customer reviews and experiences in order to determine which sales force automation software most consistently hit the mark in customer satisfaction. Real–time rankings are produced based on a transparent algorithm with the largest focus being placed on reviews left by customers.

Businesses which have used a sales force automation software in the past or are current customers of a sales force automation software are invited to CrowdReviews.com to leave a review detailing their experiences with the software. Reviews are made public to those searching for software solutions to help them find exceptional sales force automation software. Rankings are updated in real–time based on new reviews and developments which can be reviewed at any time by both buyers and providers.

To view the list of the best sales force automation solutions, or to find your sales force automation software to leave a review on, visit:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/rankings–of–best–sales–force–automation–software

User reviews are used as the most important factor by the algorithm when determining the placement of sales force automation software on the rankings. There are five key factors used by the algorithm which include review strength, engagement strength, reviewer strength, profile strength, and verified status. Each of these factors are comprised of various sub–factors which can influence how a sales force automation software is placed within the rankings. To learn more about how these factors are calculated visit:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/how–do–we–rank

Those interested in joining CrowdReviews.com can visit the following page to register or claim their profile:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/#registration

About CrowdReviews.com

CrowdReviews.com is a crowdreviewing platform which ranks over 500 software categories and 200 service categories.

topcreditcardprocessors.com Acknowledges Credit Card Processing Specialists as the Best Credit Card Processing Service for the Month of April 2016

NAPLES, FL—(Marketwired – April 30, 2016) – topcreditcardprocessors.com has reported the rankings of the 50 best credit card processing services for April 2016. Credit Card Processing Specialists
has been named the best service due to their remarkable performance during the topcreditcardprocessors.com rigorous evaluation process. The rankings are released each month to assist buyers of credit card processing services in selecting reputable services.

The process for investigating and ranking the top services offering credit card processing solutions involves a thorough evaluation of their vital strengths. The five verticals of evaluation associated with successful credit card processing projects include reliability, variance, efficiency, competitive rates, and customer support. The results of this process are used to identify which companies to include within the recommendations each month. The recommendations are updated monthly to account for the latest developments within the industry.

For a more in–depth analysis, the independent research team connects with customer references. Clients are questioned to obtain their feedback on the solutions provided to them. This provides valuable insight into the internal processes and methodologies of the service offering the solution. In many cases customers contact topcreditcardprocessors.com directly to voice their opinions.

Clients of payment processing solutions often turn to topcreditcardprocessors.com when searching for competent credit card processing services. The independent research team has named Credit Card Processing Specialists as the top service based on the results of the investigation process. topcreditcardprocessors.com strongly believes in Credit Card Processing Specialists's continued dedication towards excellence.


About Credit Card Processing Specialists

Credit Card Processing Specialists is a premier credit card processing service focused on providing competitive rates, secure processing standards, and strong customer support processes. Their merchant accounts aim to assist businesses in specialized industries improve upon and expand their payment processing potential while also producing solutions to help them solve their most common payment processing issues. In addition, Credit Card Processing Specialists offers a variety of solutions ranging from merchant cash advance to a competitive agent program.


About topcreditcardprocessors.com

topcreditcardprocessors.com is an online organizer of independent reviews and ratings. The ratings of the best payment processing services are released monthly to assist businesses in connecting with credit card processing services which feature a history of effective solutions. Thousands of payment processing services are put to the test while only the absolute best services are featured in the ratings.

Those interested in applying for the rankings can visit:


http://www.topcreditcardprocessors.com/apply–for–ranking

One Hundred Best Web Design Companies Announced in April 2016 by topseos.com

NAPLES, FL—(Marketwired – April 30, 2016) – The one hundred top web design agencies have been named by topseos.com for the month of April 2016. topseos.com provides businesses with recommendations online to feature the top internet marketing agencies which produce strong solutions to businesses searching for a variety of solutions to common issues. Agencies are highlighted based on their performance in a rigorous evaluation of their central solutions.

While many web design companies are considered for the in–depth evaluation process each month only the top companies are showcased in the rankings. The rankings are revised each month in order to account for the latest developments and achievements of competing companies in areas most commonly associated with exceptional results. The five areas of evaluation used to determine the best companies include design quality, ease of access, design analysis, project analysis, and stock quality.

The 100 best web design services for April 2016 are: 

1. The Creative Momentum

2. WebiMax

3. Brandnative

4. Customer Magnetism

5. Absolute Web Services

6. Leverage Marketing

7. Web Full Circle

8. Prime Visibility

9. Ignite Digital

10. Moonstone Interactive

11. Marketably

12. SearchPro Systems

13. 2ndLAW Media

14. David Williams

15. 39WebDesigns

16. 61 Design Street

17. B2 Interactive

18. Apollo Online

19. Nowspeed

20. EZlocal

21. AffiliateCrew

22. STI SEO Services

23. 3Prime LLC

24. Off–Road Studios

25. Local Plus Marketing

26. Clicksor Inc.

27. Corporate Conversions

28. Adage Technologies

29. DreamSoft

30. Holbi

31. Incredible Marketing

32. Modx Webdesign

33. 20/20 Creatives

34. PINT, Inc.

35. Materiell

36. AgencyQ

37. EchoPoint

38. SEO Impressions

39. EffectiveUI

40. Infoscaler Technologies

41. 70plus2 creative design

42. Movel

43. Pure Imagination

44. NeboWeb

45. Fusion92

46. Wevio

47. Ydeveloper

48. Hire Website Designer

49. 2 Web Design

50. 15miles

51. Konoozi LLC

52. Team Web USA

53. Clikzy Creative

54. 21st Century Technologies

55. Click & Go Solutions.com

56. Genesis Web Designs

57. Didit.com

58. Local Results

59. Get Local Maps

60. BeyondROI

61. A to Z Net Ventures

62. Daddy Design

63. A3 IT Solutions

64. Fishpunt Design Studio

65. Saathiva Creations

66. 61 Design Street

67. IProspect

68. ATAK Interactive

69. ICrossing

70. 39WebDesigns

71. USA Web Solutions

72. 7SEO

73. Volusion

74. Triad Web Design Service

75. Mainstreethost

76. EPageCity Inc.

77. 1Digital Agency

78. Bruce Clay

79. Web Designer Express Corp

80. BigCommerce

81. NFINITY Web Solutions

82. W3trends

83. 76Fix Web Development

84. Adaptivity Pro

85. Studio 7 Designs

86. SEO Content Lab

87. Hudson Horizons

88. Apan Software

89. ESolz Technologies

90. 540 SEO

91. Scopelink

92. 3.7 Designs

93. Envisionext

94. MoreVisibility

95. High Rank Websites

96. Nautech IT Solutions

97. Cazarin Interactive

98. Project6 Design

99. Pear Logic

100. Taoti Creative

ABOUT topseos.com

topseos.com is a well–known independent authority on search vendors. The main goal of topseos.com is to identify and disclose those individuals or firms offering the top search engine marketing solutions all over the world. A specialized team of researchers examine thousands of applicants each month who are seeking to be ranked as a top search engine marketing product or service by the independent authority.

Those interested in applying for the rankings can visit:


http://www.topseos.com/apply–for–rankings–research/

Vision Helpdesk Named Best Help Desk Software on CrowdReviews.com

SANTA FE, NM—(Marketwired – April 30, 2016) – CrowdReviews.com, a platform for reviewing and ranking help desk solutions, has announced Vision Helpdesk as the best help desk software based on the use of a transparent algorithm. Providers of help desk solutions are encouraged to invite their customers to CrowdReviews.com to leave their own reviews on the quality of solutions they are being provided.

The rankings on CrowdReviews.com are determined based on a transparent algorithm. This algorithm takes into consideration a number of elements including 5 primary factors which provides can improve in order to increase their placement within the rankings. These five factors include review strength, engagement strength, reviewer strength, profile strength, and verified status. Providers and customers alike are able to review the factors used to determine placement within the rankings at the link provided below:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/how–do–we–rank

CrowdReviews.com encourages reviewers to attach a LinkedIn profile when leaving a review in order to add additional credence to their review, allowing for visitors to ensure that a review has been written by a real customer. Reviewers are able to select whether to attach their profile to their review or to leave their review anonymously. However, while the choice is available, more weight is being placed on reviews made by those which attach their name to the review.

To view the rankings of the best help desk software visit:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/rankings–of–best–help–desk–software

Those interested in joining CrowdReviews.com can visit the following page to register or claim their profile:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/#registration

About CrowdReviews.com

CrowdReviews.com is a crowdreviewing platform which ranks over 500 software categories and 200 service categories.

CrowdReviews.com Urges Buyers of SEO Software to Select Reviewed Software

SANTA FE, NM —(Marketwired – April 30, 2016) – CrowdReviews.com, a platform for reviewing and ranking online marketing software, has released a statement urging buyers to err on the side of caution when selecting SEO software. CrowdReviews.com recommends for those searching for SEO software solutions to consult reviews and feedback from those with experience using the software. CrowdReviews.com offers a rankings platform which takes customer reviews as the most important component.

Prior to making a purchasing decision, CrowdReviews.com urges those searching for a SEO software solution to perform their due diligence in determining whether the SEO software has a history of customer satisfaction, or if their clients generally have issues using the software reliably. Since SEO software often have different features and purposes it is important to understand what the software is designed to do and whether those purposes meet your objectives.

CrowdReviews.com provides rankings of the best search engine optimization software based on a transparent algorithm which favors customer reviews above all other elements. SEO software vendors are invited to become a part of the rankings by creating or claiming their profile and inviting their customers to speak for them. Both satisfied and dissatisfied clients are urged to voice their opinions on the features, functions, and overall stability of the SEO software to help those searching search engine optimization software.

To view the rankings of the best SEO software visit:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/ratings–of–best–seo–software–based–on–user–reviews

To review the algorithm and how it affects providers of email marketing solutions visit:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/how–do–we–rank

To register or claim a profile on CrowdReviews.com, please visit:

http://www.crowdreviews.com/#registration

About CrowdReviews.com

CrowdReviews.com is a crowdreviewing platform which ranks over 500 software categories and 200 service categories.